Sure, some may cynically refer to the NIT as "The Battle For 66th" but we all know--by virtue of automatic bids into the NCAAs--it's really a battle for 35ish.
Don't laugh.
It's not exactly something a team strives for at the outset of a season, but not nearly the joke of an event some would make it out to be.
And given that most predicted the Pack to finish dead last in the league, the NIT's not a bad consolation prize for falling short of making the NCAA Tournament. And with State concluding the regular season winning five of their last seven and two games in the ACC Tournament, making the NIT field adds to the relatively positive conclusion to the year.
Here's a complete breakdown of the 32-team field, plus some of my thoughts at the end:
Thoughts:
Don't laugh.
It's not exactly something a team strives for at the outset of a season, but not nearly the joke of an event some would make it out to be.
And given that most predicted the Pack to finish dead last in the league, the NIT's not a bad consolation prize for falling short of making the NCAA Tournament. And with State concluding the regular season winning five of their last seven and two games in the ACC Tournament, making the NIT field adds to the relatively positive conclusion to the year.
Here's a complete breakdown of the 32-team field, plus some of my thoughts at the end:
The Illinois Region: | |||
1 Illinois | | RPI: 75 | | Pomeroy: 52 | Prediction: W, 72-63, 66 possessions, 81% |
8 Stony Brook | | RPI: 156 | | Pomeroy: 191 | |
4 Kent State | | RPI: 45 | | Pomeroy: 83 | Prediction: W, 69-66, 68 possessions, 63% |
5 Tulsa | | RPI: 70 | | Pomeroy: 79 | |
3 Dayton | | RPI: 51 | | Pomeroy: 45 | Prediction: W, 68-59, 65 possessions, 83% |
6 Illinois State | | RPI: 77 | | Pomeroy: 90 | |
2 Cincinnati | | RPI: 60 | | Pomeroy: 69 | Prediction: W, 74-66, 67 possessions, 79% |
7 Weber State | | RPI: 82 | | Pomeroy: 109 | |
Averages: | | RPI: 77.0 | | Pomeroy: 89.8 |
The Arizona State Region: | |||
1 Arizona State | | RPI: 65 | | Pomeroy: 42 | Prediction: W, 71-57, 63 possessions, 93% |
8 Jacksonville | | RPI: 153 | | Pomeroy: 153 | |
4 Seton Hall | | RPI: 56 | | Pomeroy: 62 | Prediction: W, 84-77, 76 possessions, 74% |
5 Texas Tech | | RPI: 67 | | Pomeroy: 80 | |
3 Memphis | | RPI: 58 | | Pomeroy: 51 | Prediction: W, 70-64, 64 possessions, 73% |
6 St. John's | | RPI: 78 | | Pomeroy: 65 | |
2 Mississippi | | RPI: 59 | | Pomeroy: 54 | Prediction: W, 82-66, 69 possessions, 93% |
7 Troy | | RPI: 113 | | Pomeroy: 174 | |
Averages: | | RPI: 81.1 | | Pomeroy: 85.1 |
The Virginia Tech Region: | |||
1 Virginia Tech | | RPI:57 | | Pomeroy: 31 | Prediction: W, 81-61, 71 possessions, 96% |
8 Quinnipiac | | RPI: 141 | | Pomeroy: 194 | |
4 UConn | | RPI: 62 | | Pomeroy: 55 | Prediction: W, 64-58, 63 possessions, 76% |
5 Northeastern | | RPI: 72 | | Pomeroy: 76 | |
3 Wichita State | | RPI: 47 | | Pomeroy: 70 | Prediction: W, 76-69, 67 possessions, 75% |
6 Nevada | | RPI: 73 | | Pomeroy: 96 | |
2 Rhode Island | | RPI: 38 | | Pomeroy: 73 | Prediction: W, 72-63 66 possessions, 81% |
7 Northwestern | | RPI: 116 | | Pomeroy: 77 | |
Averages: | | RPI: 75.8 | | Pomeroy: 84.0 |
The Mississippi State Region: | |||
1 Mississippi St. | | RPI: 55 | | Pomeroy: 41 | Prediction: W, 72-63, 66 possessions, 81% |
8 Jackson State | | RPI: 201 | | Pomeroy: 288 | |
4 UNC | | RPI: 89 | | Pomeroy: 63 | Prediction: W, 72-63, 65 possessions, 83% |
5 William & Mary | | RPI: 61 | | Pomeroy: 113 | |
3 South Florida | | RPI: 68 | | Pomeroy: 78 | Prediction: W, 64-62, 63 possessions, 56% |
6 NC State | | RPI: 95 | | Pomeroy: 59 | |
2 UAB | | RPI: 44 | | Pomeroy: 67 | Prediction: W, 65-55, 62 possessions, 87% |
7 Coastal Carolina | | RPI: 135 | | Pomeroy: 147 | |
Averages: | | RPI: 93.5 | | Pomeroy: 107.0 |
Thoughts:
- State ended up in BY FAR the easiest region. There are two teams with RPIs over 100--one being Jackson State's 201--and three with Pomeroy ratings above 100. Both of this region's average RPI and Pomeroy ratings are nearly 20 points lower than the highest, the Virginia Tech region.
- Speaking of Virginia Tech, they weren't done any favors being one of the first teams left out of the NCAA Tournament. They landed in the statistically most-difficult region in the tournament. Their opening round game against Quinnipiac should be a breeze, but beyond them lie either UConn or Northeastern, two teams that could easily beat the Hokies on the road. If Seth Greenberg can't get them ready to play after the dejection of missing out on the Big Dance, it could mean an early exit for one of the tournament's #1 seeds (and a black eye for the ACC).
- The Tar Heels were gifted a #4 seed but host a very strong team in William & Mary. The Tribe has beaten several good opponents already this year, including Maryland, and has an RPI 38 spots higher than the Heels. However, W&M has a Pomeroy rating 50 points lower than Carolina, so there's a potential for good game in Chapel Hill.
- State's game against South Florida has been tabbed by Ken Pomeroy's site as the FanMatch game of the night. Ken uses a formula to determine--based factors like tempo, style of play, strengths and weakness, etc.--to predict entertaining games. I think his formula is right on this one...I expect State to put up a great fight on the road.
- Some quirky items: UConn and Northeastern face off in a battle the Huskies...Jacksonville's RPI and Pomeroy rating are identical: 153...Both "Wolfpacks" (State's Wolfpack and Nevada's Wolf Pack) are six seeds, and could meet in the NIT Final Four.
Say Yes to the NIT and no to a 96 team NCAA. Worst idea since ACC expansion (meaning it'll probably happen)
ReplyDeleteyea, NCSU is in the NIT. Great. everyone is excited about how State finished the regular season and their play in the ACC tournament. in 2007 State played great in the ACC tournament and made it to the final game. State also played well in the NIT in 2007. State lost only Atsur and again, everyone was excited about next year. State had a great recruiting class including Smith and Hiskson. State was picked to finish 3rd in the conference in 2008. what happened? after Degand got hurt, the team imploded and finished last. they lost a lackluster game to Miami in the first round of the ACC tournament. hope State does better in 2011, but one never knows. sbas2
ReplyDeleteHickson as opposed to Hiskson. yikes! sbas2
ReplyDeletethe excited about 2008 was predicated on Coster, McCauley and Fells returning. Costner never again showed any sign of what he did in that ACC tournament. Plus, we didn't have a PG returning. Looking back, it was more of a blind optimism. I feel differently about this team. I could be wrong.
ReplyDeleteAnd after hearing all about V Tech, I change my mind, there's no way they should be in the NCAA tournament. Greenburg's OOC scheduling is even worse than an old NC State coach I used to know.